Quote:
Originally Posted by bcl Jim, I asked you several days ago to remove this comment - it is quite misleading. |
I will not have time to participate in the usual to and fro as we are rolling out a new site that will take weeks to get right. However, please feel free to paste your usual rebuttal in full and I will respond as soon as I am able.
You may remember that we shared concerns about low EPC rates around two years ago but did not know why. I would have to check my inbox for the exact dates but at that time you left CM completely and we decided to stay. On or around October of 2006 I convinced you to rejoin CM but you were on the CM network only a short time after you discovered the cookie (
1 hour 30 minutes and 32 seconds)
time difference thing.
We left CM, you left CM. You left CM before us, twice. I said "As usual, Gayle was about six months ahead of us. =))". I did not say or suggest you left because of adware. You are the only person I know who can take a compliment and turn it into a problem. You will remember that is was you who called me in 2007 (January?) to alert me to new adware affiliate activity in Australia.
Split hairs if you like but saying my statement was misleading was petty in my opinion.
In this news article you said "Certainly we have lost some of our commissions," says Gayle Dallaston, publisher of a Brisbane website developer, BCL, which employs six people to earn "affiliate" commissions by generating traffic and sales for online merchants and news and entertainment portals. "The last 18 months has been a huge learning curve. I'm seeing a lot less of it now because we are watching."
AND
"BCL's Gayle Dallaston says it is convenient for the bigger internet groups to blame rogue affiliates when it is "a small part of the story". Dubious activity is more widespread, she says."
What did you mean by that?